What makes a virtual server a better or worse than a physical one? A question like this requires some thinking and understanding between the use of physical and virtual storage servers. A virtual storage system has benefits that will put a physical server to shame. However, always consider this, each provides its own benefits and fulfills a specific need.
The most obvious characteristic of physical servers is that they are in fact physical. They are actual pieces of hardware that require installation and understanding. Physical servers are often in the shape of a rack or wire server. Other things to consider when applying a physical server:
- A physical server is best for CPU intensive applications. A physical server is specifically dedicated for system resources. A physical server is often used for a specific set of uses, thus the server will not interfere with other issues or essential applications.
- Physical servers should be used for the monitoring of virtual hosts. A virtual host should be monitored by a physical host. In case the virtual host has issues than the physical server is there. That’s why server applications are done via physical host, they offer protection and backup since a virtual host could go down.
- The downside to a physical server include: time necessary for setup, hardware changes, cost, physical space and movement, problems arising due to physical failures, and expertise in hardware for issues.
A virtual server is a newer development that has become far more widespread for small businesses and casual customers. A virtual server is less expensive, less intrusive, and far simpler to install since there are no physical parts that need to be placed. A major difference between physical and virtual servers that affect performance is that virtual servers can be expanded upon far easier than a physical server, which comes with a designated allotment of space.
- Virtual servers are far more flexible than physical servers. They can be expanded, moved, and setup to specific needs. For example, a virtual server is often offered on a price per usage which of course can be adjusted.
- Server isolation and the consolidation of tools also provide far more flexibility than a physical server.
- Monitoring can be done without having to understand the physical hardware parts. Also, virtualization is becoming increasingly common and prices are often competitive and adjustable.
- Some negative issues with virtual servers include: initially costly but higher ROI can be effectively seen as a negation of this aspect. Also, issues with licensing and concentration.
A virtual server holds its benefits but it ultimately will depend on what need it will fulfill. Keeping options open and understanding the intricacies that come with both a physical and virtual server will ultimately guide which is best for you and your business. There is no clear winner or answer to which is a better fit, it will ultimately depend on the client.
Author Bio:– Deney serves as CEO for Nordisk Systems, Inc. The best place to get all of your server needs can be found at Nordisk Systems, they offer a wide variety of server, virtualization, and cloud services. For more information visit: http://www.nordisksystems.com.